Re: [Issue 4070] forced update doesn't correct eols of existing obstructions

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:41 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> I can see the rationale for not showing it in status (since it can't be
>> committed), but I suppose there is a reason to show it --- namely, that
>> if the file has svn:eol-style=LF but the on-disk file has CRLF line
>> endings, that might break my build and I'd like the tool to tell me
>> about it.
>>
>> I'm leaning to +1 on having 'svn status' _optionally_ report files that
>> have the wrong eol style on disk.
>
> I would never have assumed that 'svn status' *didn't* report such files.
> Have we always had such madness as our default behavior?!

We have, at least as far back as 1.4 (which is the oldest client I
have lying about right now).

> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
>
>
Received on 2011-11-28 21:06:32 CET