[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Questions about get_most_inclusive_end_rev()

From: Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:06:34 +0000

Paul Burba wrote:
> You are correct, the doc string had it backwards.  I fixed that.
> I removed the check and then, since get_most_inclusive_start_rev() and
> get_most_inclusive_end_rev() are almost identical, I combined the two
> into a new function get_most_inclusive_rev.
> All the above changes were made in r1204617.

Thanks, Paul. That's much clearer.

- Julian
Received on 2011-11-21 19:07:09 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.