[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit --targets behaviour change in 1.7?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:55:15 +0200

On Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:38 PM, "Fergus Slorach" <sugref_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, it works with svn 1.6. It's 1.7 that doesn't work.
>
> > ./svn-undelete.sh
...
> svn: E200009: '/home/fergus/downloads/wc/A/D/H' is not under version control and is not part of the commit, yet its child '/home/fergus/downloads/wc/A/D/H/psi' is part of the commit
>
>

Doh, my mistake. I'll transform that into an XFail regression test now. Thanks again.

>
> On 11/13/2011 11:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:07 PM, "Fergus Slorach"<sugref_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the quick response.
> >>
> >> Here's the recipe - this works in 1.6 but fails with 1.7
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >>
> >> fergus
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for the script. It appears to work for me using the system's svn 1.6.17:
> >
> > [[[
> > daniel_at_tarsus:/tmp> sh ./svn-undelete.sh
> > ### Making a Greek Tree for import...
> > ### Done.
> >
> > ### Importing it...
> > ### Done.
> >
> > ### This is where your reproduction recipe goes. ###
> > D A/D/gamma
> > D A/D/G/pi
> > D A/D/G/rho
> > D A/D/G/tau
> > D A/D/G
> > D A/D/H/chi
> > D A/D/H/omega
> > D A/D/H/psi
> > D A/D/H
> > D A/D
> > Deleting A/D
> >
> > Committed revision 2.
> > At revision 2.
> > --- Reverse-merging r2 into '.':
> > A A/D
> > A A/D/gamma
> > A A/D/G
> > A A/D/G/pi
> > A A/D/G/rho
> > A A/D/G/tau
> > A A/D/H
> > A A/D/H/chi
> > A A/D/H/omega
> > A A/D/H/psi
> > Adding A/D
> > Adding A/D/G
> > Adding A/D/G/pi
> > Adding A/D/G/rho
> > Adding A/D/G/tau
> > Adding A/D/H
> > Adding A/D/H/chi
> > Adding A/D/H/omega
> > Adding A/D/H/psi
> > Adding A/D/gamma
> >
> > Committed revision 3.
> > daniel_at_tarsus:/tmp> svn --version -q
> > 1.6.17
> > daniel_at_tarsus:/tmp>
> > ]]]
> >
> > Is that the expected "works as intended" output? What version of 1.6.x
> > are you using? Could you try upgrading to 1.6.17?
> >
> > Daniel
> >
>
Received on 2011-11-13 11:55:46 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.