[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn propchange: r1182979 - svn:log

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:36:04 +0200

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:58:56PM -0000, stefan2_at_apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Revision: 1182979
> Modified property: svn:log
>
> Modified: svn:log at Thu Oct 13 16:58:56 2011
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- svn:log (original)
> +++ svn:log Thu Oct 13 16:58:56 2011
> @@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
> +Remove a #if APR_HAS_THREADS statement. They have been one reason for
> +introducing svn_mutex__t in the first place.

So you're saying that svn_mutex__t is intended to provide an abstraction
layer which hides APR_HAS_THREADS? If so, why does svn_mutex__init()
take a boolean parameter 'enable_mutex', which essentially specifies whether
APR supports threads? Shouldn't the function figure that out by itself?
Received on 2011-10-13 22:36:40 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.