Re: Install and INSTALL issues
Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:25:19AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
>> > That idea won't fly. Because --prefix is also used by distribution packagers
>> > to install svn into a fake prefix to prepare for packaging.
>> > In which case they do want the apache modules.
>> I'd expect packagers to use the true, final destination in --prefix and
>> then to set DESTDIR during 'make install' when building the package.
> Correct, that is what happens, yes. Thanks for correcting me.
> But they still use --prefix, so deciding wether or not to install
> apache modules based on whether a --prefix option was passed is not
> a good idea.
We have had similar discussions in the past about where the bindings
should install. I think everything should install under prefix by
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
Received on 2011-10-12 11:42:18 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev