[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1174517 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:03:26 -0400

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:16 AM, <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Fri Sep 23 05:16:21 2011
> New Revision: 1174517
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1174517&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Re-tweak my vote on the #4013 group.
>
> Modified:
>    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1174517&r1=1174516&r2=1174517&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Fri Sep 23 05:16:21 2011
> @@ -126,7 +126,10 @@ Candidate changes:
>      +1: pburba, philip
>      +0: ivan (r1173425 only, restart soak period for at least two weeks due
>                API and client/server protocol)
> -     +0: danielsh (I didn't review merge_tests.py or merge.c changes)
> +     +0: danielsh (I didn't review merge_tests.py.
> +                   All changes in merge.c look good, but I can't tell if
> +                   additional changes that should have been included are
> +                   missing, so not upgrading the vote to +1.)

Hi Daniel,

Does http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?r1=1174813&r2=1174812&pathrev=1174813
address your concerns? Or was there something else that concerned
you?

Paul

>  * r1174111
>    Use the correct function to copy repositories in the testsuite.
>
>
>
Received on 2011-09-27 02:03:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.