What does this fix?
- Julian
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:25 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Does this look correct? locks-test and lock_tests.py both pass.
>
> [[[
> * subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/locks-table.c
> (svn_fs_bdb__locks_get):
> Set LOOKUP_PATH before constructing BDB's KEY from it.
> ]]]
>
> [[[
> Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/locks-table.c
> ===================================================================
> --- subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/locks-table.c (revision 1173129)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/locks-table.c (working copy)
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ svn_fs_bdb__locks_get(svn_fs_t *fs,
> const char *lock_token;
> svn_lock_t *lock;
> svn_error_t *err;
> - const char *lookup_path = path;
> + const char *lookup_path;
>
> /* First, try to lookup PATH itself. */
> err = svn_fs_bdb__lock_token_get(&lock_token, fs, path, trail, pool);
> @@ -238,6 +238,11 @@ svn_fs_bdb__locks_get(svn_fs_t *fs,
> &cursor, 0);
> SVN_ERR(BDB_WRAP(fs, "creating cursor for reading lock tokens", db_err));
>
> + if (!svn_fspath__is_root(path, strlen(path)))
> + lookup_path = apr_pstrcat(pool, path, "/", (char *)NULL);
> + else
> + lookup_path = path;
> +
> /* Since the key is going to be returned as well as the value make
> sure BDB malloc's the returned key. */
> svn_fs_base__str_to_dbt(&key, lookup_path);
> @@ -247,9 +252,6 @@ svn_fs_bdb__locks_get(svn_fs_t *fs,
> the one passed in, by passing in the DB_RANGE_SET flag. */
> db_err = svn_bdb_dbc_get(cursor, &key, svn_fs_base__result_dbt(&value),
> DB_SET_RANGE);
> -
> - if (!svn_fspath__is_root(path, strlen(path)))
> - lookup_path = apr_pstrcat(pool, path, "/", (char *)NULL);
>
> /* As long as the prefix of the returned KEY matches LOOKUP_PATH we
> know it is either LOOKUP_PATH or a decendant thereof. */
> ]]]
Received on 2011-09-20 16:04:09 CEST