Re: question for FSFS gurus (was: Re: FSFS successor ID design draft)
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 13:41, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:06:40AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43:29PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > I'll try to tweak my proposal such that successor ID updates become
>> > transactional and happen as part of every commit.
>> Here's a first shot at this. Comments welcome.
> FSFS gurus:
> Are any of you looking at this?
> Do you think this is worth writing a prototype implementation for?
> I have so far only received feedback from danielsh. This makes me very
> happy but if anyone with a couple more years of FSFS experience under
> their belt could comment I would be even happier.
I'm not FSFS guru, but I still feel that FSFS successor ID doesn't
worth to be implemented because there is no strong reasons/usage for
it. For me it looks like bottom-up design approach.
Received on 2011-09-05 11:47:20 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev