[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] get-location-segments.py would work on self-signed ssl servers too

From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar <prabhugs_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:24:35 +0530

On Friday 02 September 2011 11:54 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
> On Monday 22 August 2011 09:37 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 August 2011 06:46 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> I tried your patch against
>>> https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/README
>>> (which uses a non-self-signed cert, but rather one for which the cert's
>>> hostname differs from the URI's hostname), and it didn't seem to work:
>>>
>>> [[[
>>> ./tools/examples/get-location-segments.py
>>> https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/README
>>> Untrusted cert details are as follows:
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Issuer : 07969287, http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository,
>>> GoDaddy.com, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona, US
>>> Hostname : svn.apache.org
>>> ValidFrom : Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:56:12 GMT
>>> ValidUpto : Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:18:55 GMT
>>> Fingerprint:
>>> cc:54:a4:a9:ec:3a:9b:1c:23:ac:2d:57:c6:96:9f:5f:4a:1d:2d:86
>>>
>>> accept (t)temporarily (p)permanently: t
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File "./tools/examples/get-location-segments.py", line 147,
>>> in<module>
>>> main()
>>> File "./tools/examples/get-location-segments.py", line 142, in main
>>> ra_session = ra.open(url, ra_callbacks, None, ctx.config)
>>> File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/libsvn/ra.py", line 534, in
>>> svn_ra_open
>>> return _ra.svn_ra_open(*args)
>>> svn.core.SubversionException: ("OPTIONS of
>>> 'https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/README': Server
>>> certificate verification failed: certificate issued for a different
>>> hostname (https://svn.eu.apache.org)", 175002)
>>> zsh: exit 1 ./tools/examples/get-location-segments.py
>>> ]]]
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>>
>> Something interesting... It is failing for me only with neon, but
>> working fine with serf, seeing some inconsistencies here...
>
> Observations after immense exploration by Vijay and me...
>
> I am using OpenSSL0.9.8o and Neon0.27. The problem is that this
> version of OpenSSL does not have the SNI support i.e, has a (broken)
> default SNI support.
>
> This has been fixed in OpenSSL1.0.0d and Neon0.28.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards
> Prabhu
>
Received on 2011-09-02 08:55:35 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.