[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Really lousy performance with svn info --depth infinity

From: <michael_rytting_at_agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:05:54 -0600

Svn info --depth inifinty

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:05 AM
To: RYTTING,MICHAEL (A-ColSprings,ex1)
Cc: philip.martin_at_wandisco.com; dev_at_subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Really lousy performance with svn info --depth infinity

What command is slower in 1.7 compared to 1.6?

michael_rytting_at_agilent.com wrote on Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:55:30 -0600:
> We are still using 1.6.x for our repository. I wonder if there is a funny interaction going on here. I might need to do some more digging, but the performance we are seeing is currently 1000x slower with 1.7 working copy vs 1.6 working copy.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.martin_at_wandisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 9:52 AM
> To: RYTTING,MICHAEL (A-ColSprings,ex1)
> Cc: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Really lousy performance with svn info --depth infinity
>
> <michael_rytting_at_agilent.com> writes:
>
> > Quick question. I would expect the following 2 commands to perform
> > equivalent functions.
> >
> > svn info -depth infinity
> > svn ls -depth infinity | xargs svn info
> >
> > This issue is that the first command takes 1 minute to run while the
> > second command takes 6 seconds to run. I am running 1.7.0-rc2.
>
> I'm using a working copy that is Subversion trunk and a local repository as my dataset on my Linux machine. Both commands take about 1 second with a hot cache.
>
> --
> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
> http://www.uberSVN.com
Received on 2011-09-01 18:06:27 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.