Re: 1.7.0-beta2 up for testing / signing

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-22, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-07-21, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> >> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
>> >> signing: 1.7.0-beta2.
>> >
>> > +1 to release (Unix).
>> >
>> > My two signatures were successfully collected by your script.
>> >
>> > Tested:
>> >
>> >  [ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ]
>> >  swig-py
>> >  swig-pl
>> >  swig-rb
>> >
>> >  (I also built ctypes-python and javahl, but couldn't get their tests
>> > to run.  I'm assuming that's a local problem.  It's not a new problem.)
>> >
>> > Environment:
>> >
>> >  OS/Platform:
>> >    Ubuntu 10.10, 2.6.35-30-generic i686 GNU/Linux
>> >
>> >  Using no in-tree build of dependencies.
>> >
>> >  Using Ubuntu distribution-supplied packages:
>> >    libapr1 1.4.2-3ubuntu1
>> >    libaprutil1 1.3.9+dfsg-3build1
>> >    libdb-dev 4.8
>> >    openssl 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4
>> >    perl 5.10.1-12ubuntu2
>> >    python 2.6.6-2ubuntu1
>> >    python 2.6.6-2ubuntu2
>> >    zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu1
>> >    ruby 1.8.7
>> >    neon 0.29.3
>> >
>> >  Using self-built packages:
>> >    serf 0.7.2
>> >
>> > Results:
>> >
>> >  make check ... (8 ways): No failures.
>> >
>> > Signatures:
>> >
>> > ::: subversion-1.5.9.tar.bz2 :::
>>
>> Typo?
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> [...]
>
> Oops, those are old sigs.  The correct sigs are:
>
> ::: subversion-1.7.0-beta2.tar.bz2 :::
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEABECAAYFAk4pjbQACgkQNR8z5DU+Jbyp4ACgi3OEGaxS//W/nb0TytqVhUvU
> nWcAnj3yutmU0aYnnLwkE4qFoOrGs2/v
> =8xfU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ::: subversion-1.7.0-beta2.tar.gz :::
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEABECAAYFAk4pjbQACgkQNR8z5DU+JbywHwCbBP1e+xft8atZ6+Y//dLJ2U18
> chYAoJAqOuFaGBlP5TB5yfijKuQdiGSu
> =AAJB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> (I believe I posted the correct sigs to the sig collection web page, as
> it reported success whereas it would have reported the old sigs as
> 'bad'.)

Yep, the sigs submitted through the script were valid (and I also
validate all the sigs before copying them to /dist/ anyway).

-Hyrum

-- 
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/