On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 22:56, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been using 1.7 exclusively now on all systems. I am using it from
> Subclipse, command line and TortoiseSVN. I am very happy with it from my
> own usage and I would be +1 on a RC.
> I have not been following all of the items that have gone through STATUS. I
> know there have been a LOT of nice bugs and fixes caught and there will
> likely be more. But I do not recall any of the type that we would have had
> to overly rush to get a 1.7.1 out if they had made into a release.
> I personally think that Neon should be our default for 1.7 and would like to
> see us make that change. However, given that just about everyone that
> produces binaries for download seems likely to patch the code so that Neon
> is the default anyway, it is not something I am going to fight for. It
> might even give us the best of both worlds. Most users will still be using
> Neon but given that Serf is the default in the source code there will still
> be a lot more users using it and filing bugs.
Just as an info:
I too had to switch back to neon for the TSVN nightly builds. The beta
release of TSVN was built with serf as the default, and we already had
a lot of reports where checkouts failed, listing repositories failed,
authentication crashed (found from sent crash dump files), ....
All of those issues could be 'resolved' by switching to neon in the
servers file. So to avoid those problems, I made neon the default in
And remember: there are a lot of people out there who don't install
beta versions, so all the reports we already got are only from a very
minor percentage of TSVN users.
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on 2011-07-27 16:25:25 CEST