Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote on 07/19/2011 06:53:12 PM:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> > release-readiness? What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it in
> > appropriate state based on that library's readiness at this moment?
> The only pending serf issue is my testing of a fix to memory blowup in
> ra_serf when somebody checks out a repository root (ie. 10's of
> thousands of files across trunk, tags, and branches). Personally, I
> think it is a bug that could be fixed in 1.7.1, but I'm shooting to
> get the code tested for a 1.7.0 release. It is currently disabled on
> trunk and 1.7.x, but a simple two-line fix enables it.
I've seen revisions where millions (yes, I said millions) of files were
changed at one time, so I feel ra_serf needs to be able to handle
10's of millions of files in trunk alone during an update without
needing TBs of memory...
(I'm not saying I would recommend using Subversion in this way, just
that I have seen older versions abused in amazing ways...)
Received on 2011-07-20 15:24:30 CEST