On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:18, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
> >> BTW: Someone mentioned using svn 1.7 beta1 and some said it was not
> >> released yet. Collabnet disagree as beta1 is listed here:
> CollabNet should not have posted that tarball. It was never blessed
> and released by the Apache Subversion team. In fact, we *withdrew* our
> beta1 candidate. There is not, and never will be, a 1.7.0 beta 1.
CollabNet did not post anything. In an open-source project (mine), on a
hosting site operated by CollabNet, I posted my Windows binaries in a
listing labelled "Development Builds" just as I have been doing from trunk
for months. This is not different than TortoiseSVN, Subclipse or AnkhSVN
which all post nightly builds so people can try our software. I did not
post the source tarball, I posted my build of the Windows binaries and I
will likely continue to do so as the branch progresses towards release.
I made no special announcement about this, just as I have not for any of the
other updates to the binaries I have made in the last several months. After
building beta1 and running the performance benchmarks I simply posted the
binaries for others to try them. I am not even the one that added a link to
these binaries from the Subversion website.
That said, I do encourage Windows users to download the binaries and
continue to provide us feedback. There are no known show-stopper bugs in
beta1, feel free to use at your own discretion.
Received on 2011-07-20 02:16:33 CEST