Ivan Zhakov wrote on Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 21:54:19 +0400:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 21:46, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:45:09 -0400:
> >> On 07/19/2011 03:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 23:50, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> >> >> Ivan notes on IRC that this fixes issues with non-ASCII lock tokens.
> >> >> (At least, he reports errors in 'svn ls -v' over http://; but for me
> >> >> 'ls' and 'info' work fine over svn://.)
> >> >>
> >> >> Are lock tokens even permitted to be non-ASCII?
> >> >> (both backends generate ASCII-only lock tokens (in the same manner))
> >> >>
> >> >> If they are, are they required to be in UTF-8? Or can they be, say,
> >> >> arbitrary octet strings?
> >> >>
> >> > I didn't find explicit specification for lock token encoding, but it
> >> > handled everywhere as normal utf-8 string.
> >> >
> >> > That's why I decided to implement minimum patch just to decide lock
> >> > token returned from hook output to utf-8 string.
> >> >
> >> > But I'm fine to require lock token to be ASCII only string.
> >>
> >> Having this as an open question is unacceptable, so we need to make a
> >> decision about it. To my knowledge, ASCII is the only thing used for lock
> >> tokens in the code we ship. There's no telling what encoding could be in
> >
> > For the record, our code generates tokens in the form
> > "opaquelocktoken:$UUID".
> >
> >> use if folks are taking advantage of the pre-lock-hook token dictation
> >> feature -- Apache will give them a "C" locale environment, but sure anyone
> >> who has advanced enough configuration to require taking advantage of this
> >> feature is also setting the locale from inside those hooks.
> >>
> >> FWIW, I think UTF-8 is a fine choice, especially if we've been internally
> >> handling this string as UTF-8 already. But let's document the fact
> >> somewhere, please (preferably in the pre-lock-hook template comments).
> >>
> >
> > Looking again, svn_fs.h:2059 documents that lock tokens are URI's.
> > (and, consequently, are printable ASCII)
> >
> > We also need them to be XML-safe for their use in ra_dav LOCK responses.
> >
> > So, I'm thinking that:
> >
> > * We should validate the supplied lock tokens, not for being well-formed
> > UTF-8 as in Ivan's change, but for being ASCII-only.
> >
> > * We should move the validation to the FS layer.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> I'm fine with this approach, but I think we should leave explicit
> validation of lock tokens in pre-lock hook handling for better
> diagnostic.
I don't think that's necessary, given that we don't (and likely won't)
do anything between calling the pre-lock hook and calling svn_fs_lock().
Anyway, untested patch:
[[[
Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/lock.c
===================================================================
--- subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/lock.c (revision 1147872)
+++ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/lock.c (working copy)
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ svn_fs_fs__generate_lock_token(const char **token,
want to use the fs UUID + some incremented number? For now, we
generate a URI that matches the DAV RFC. We could change this to
some other URI scheme someday, if we wish. */
- *token = apr_pstrcat(pool, "opaquelocktoken:",
+ *token = apr_pstrcat(pool, "opaquelocktoken:", /* ### */
svn_uuid_generate(pool), (char *)NULL);
return SVN_NO_ERROR;
}
Index: subversion/libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c
===================================================================
--- subversion/libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c (revision 1147872)
+++ subversion/libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c (working copy)
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <apr_md5.h>
#include <apr_thread_mutex.h>
#include <apr_uuid.h>
+#include <apr_uri.h>
#include "svn_types.h"
#include "svn_dso.h"
@@ -1303,6 +1304,31 @@ svn_fs_lock(svn_lock_t **lock, svn_fs_t *fs, const
return svn_error_create
(SVN_ERR_XML_UNESCAPABLE_DATA, NULL,
_("Lock comment contains illegal characters"));
+ }
+
+ /* Enforce that the token be an XML-safe URI. */
+ if (token)
+ {
+ apr_uri_t uri;
+ apr_status_t status;
+
+ status = apr_uri_parse(pool, token, &uri);
+ if (status)
+ return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_FS_BAD_LOCK_TOKEN,
+ svn_error_wrap_apr(status, NULL),
+ _("Can't parse token '%s' as a URI"),
+ token);
+
+ if (strcmp(uri.scheme, "opaquelocktoken"))
+ return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_FS_BAD_LOCK_TOKEN, NULL,
+ _("Lock token URI '%s' has bad scheme; "
+ "expected '%s'"),
+ token, "opaquelocktoken");
+
+ if (! svn_xml_is_xml_safe(token, strlen(token)))
+ return svn_error_create(
+ SVN_ERR_FS_BAD_LOCK_TOKEN, NULL,
+ _("Lock token URI is not XML-safe"));
}
if (expiration_date < 0)
Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_base/lock.c
===================================================================
--- subversion/libsvn_fs_base/lock.c (revision 1147872)
+++ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/lock.c (working copy)
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ svn_fs_base__generate_lock_token(const char **toke
want to use the fs UUID + some incremented number? For now, we
generate a URI that matches the DAV RFC. We could change this to
some other URI scheme someday, if we wish. */
- *token = apr_pstrcat(pool, "opaquelocktoken:",
+ *token = apr_pstrcat(pool, "opaquelocktoken:", /* ### */
svn_uuid_generate(pool), (char *)NULL);
return SVN_NO_ERROR;
}
]]]
I'll commit something along these lines (after testing that it works and
so on) if I don't hear otherwise.
Received on 2011-07-19 22:58:01 CEST