Re: 1.7.0-beta1 up for testing / signing

On 07/15/2011 10:53 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Sorry, guys -- I've been watching the messages flying back and forth, but
> haven't been able to discern a key piece of information from them:
>
> Is this a regression?
>
> I ask because I test all our releases the same way, and 1.7.0-alpha3 did
> *not* exhibit this problem I reported where 1.7.0-beta1 does. Now, it's
> possible that there was a small difference in my testing approach this time,
> namely that I might have actually installed the compiled product on my
> system instead of merely running the tests having *not* done 'make install
> install-pl ...'.
>
> I'll start over from scratch to see if skipping the install step (which,
> again, I typically do) makes the difference.

Yep, it matters. That one difference in my test routine caused the problem.

So, Hyrum, you have my +1 for this release:

Summary:

   +1 to release.

Platform:

   Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) Linux.

Tested:

   (local, svn, neon, serf) x (bdb, fsfs) + py + py + pl + rb + javahl

Results:

   All tests pass.

MD5 Checksums:

   34686ebaba49bcf98206acb4e020ae6a subversion-1.7.0-beta1.tar.gz
   8b184d9484f10edb6d5921e050d9d69b subversion-1.7.0-beta1.tar.bz2

GPG Signatures (left-aligned because Hyrum likes it that way):

::: subversion-1.7.0-beta1.tar.gz :::
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk4fFt0ACgkQokEGqRcG/W4D1QCbBJI+R8A/3UKZXgzrgbXGLTYC
L90An0iS1ebHvf5RMGmHprphgmuieaTD
=Q3l6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

::: subversion-1.7.0-beta1.tar.bz2 :::
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk4fFuAACgkQokEGqRcG/W7/FwCfR9YzGu/aEzV4+8PIZRpp5rXj
maAAn06ZNy/Z9PKDHdaPLTnQTv3kh/8U
=dZch
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand