[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: (Possible) bug in the way we track the mergeinfo property

From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar <prabhugs_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:54:25 +0530

On Thursday 14 July 2011 09:18 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar
> <prabhugs_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am in the process of writing a script which would check for the mergeinfo
>> of a path and see if the path is present through all the revisions mentioned
>> in the mergeinfo property. If the path was not found for any revision range
>> then the script would suggest(as of now) a better way to propget the
>> mergeinfo property or even propset the correct mergeinfo property (not yet
>> decided on this though).
>> In the process of testing the script against our "trunk" source I could see
>> some bogus mergeinfo properties when there is a break in the history.
>> Here is an example:
>> The mergeinfo for
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/tree-conflicts is
>> 868291-873154
>> but if I do location_segments for this range of revision for the above path,
>> I get
>> r868291 - r872329: subversion/branches/tree-conflicts
>> r872330 - r872524: null
>> r872525 - r873154: subversion/branches/tree-conflicts
>> After looking at log -v, it was clear that the
>> "subversion/branches/tree-conflicts" was deleted and copied (i.e replaced).
>> Logically the branch "tree-conflicts" was not present at all at the revision
>> range r872330-872524.
>> This brings a breakage of history. But the mergeinfo is not clear enough to
>> show this change.
>> I tested the same case with the 1.6.12, 1.6.17 and the trunk builds. The
>> (possible) bug is seen in all the three cases.
>> I have not yet filed any bug so far. Please share your thoughts.
> Hi Prabhu,
> There are a few known issues where mergeinfo can be created which
> describes non-existent merge sources:
> One still open:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3867
> Two which have been fixed:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3432
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3669
> I might be forgetting a couple others, but those are the ones that come to mind.
> You might want to check if one of those three is the culprit here.

Thanks Paul, this case is different from all the above three cases though it looked
quite similar to the case, http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3669

Here there seems to be no sign of inheritance of mergeinfo as is the case in "3669" and no sign of
copyfrom as is the case in "3432".

Received on 2011-07-15 11:25:26 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.