[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1146149 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/include/private/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/libsvn_subr/

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:43:33 -0400

See:

http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#subtree-mergeinfo-recording

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 13, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Peter Samuelson <peter_at_p12n.org> wrote:

>
> [Greg Stein]
>> Is there any way that we can remove the svn:mergeinfo property from
>> those files? I'm not sure if that would be Proper, or if that would
>> bust something up.
>
> They probably aren't needed, but we really should eat our own dogfood.
> If subtree mergeinfo causes problems (even if only the readability
> problems of a commit mail with a small diff swamped by meaningless
> noise), best to address those problems, rather than just try to _not_
> use this feature that apparently our users wanted.
>
> That, or implement Andy's hand-wavy 'newmerge' that punts on subtree
> merges entirely. (:
> --
> Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
Received on 2011-07-14 00:44:22 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.