[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1146452 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:08:26 +0300

gstein_at_apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 20:51:17 -0000:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Wed Jul 13 20:51:17 2011
> New Revision: 1146452
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1146452&view=rev
> Log:
> votes!
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1146452&r1=1146451&r2=1146452&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Wed Jul 13 20:51:17 2011
> @@ -15,14 +15,6 @@ Status of 1.7.0:
> Candidate changes:
> ==================
>
> - * r1146013
> - Improve notifications of paths skipped because they were conflicted
> - Justification:
> - Improves general usability of the svn client and the libsvn_client api
> - and would have to wait for 1.8.0 if it doesn't get in 1.7.0.
> - Votes:
> - +1: rhuijben, cmpilato
> -
> * r1146131, r1146134
> Add svn_fs_verify() API.
> Justification:
> @@ -32,6 +24,10 @@ Candidate changes:
> +1: danielsh, rhuijben
> -1: stsp (no-op API change)
> -1: cmpilato (no-op API change -- will reconsider if real utility is added)
> + -1: gstein (callers have no idea if the function will do anything
> + since they don't know if they're working with 1.7.0 or
> + 1.7.10, so why bother to call it at all? cross your
> + fingers and hope?)

svn_fs_version().minor

>
> * r1146214, r1146381
> Handle NULL inputs when stringifying svn_checksum_t.
> @@ -39,7 +35,8 @@ Candidate changes:
> Avoids segfaults.
> Votes:
> +1: danielsh
> - -0: cmpilato, rhuijben (problem is with callers, not implementation)
> + -0: cmpilato, rhuijben, gstein (problem is with callers,
> + not implementation)
>

Just a reminder: this revision IS present on trunk, so someone please
suggest how to change trunk to avoid releasing this triply-(-0)ed change
in 1.8.0.
Received on 2011-07-13 23:09:16 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.