Re: do away with db/revprops/*/, and a question about 'upgrade' concurrency

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:07:38 +0100

Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> writes:

> Where does that happen? svn_repos_upgrade2() calls get_repos() which
> calls lock_repos() which is a no-op if the underlying filesystem is
> FSFS.

My mistake, I skipped over the bdb-only line.

-- 
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com

Received on 2011-07-12 11:08:46 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bolstridge, Andrew: "Offline Commits (WAS: It's time to fix Subversion Merge)"
Previous message: Ivan Zhakov: "Re: svn commit: r1143860 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c"
In reply to: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: do away with db/revprops/*/, and a question about 'upgrade' concurrency"
Next in thread: Hyrum K Wright: "Re: do away with db/revprops/*/, and a question about 'upgrade' concurrency (was: Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]