[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fsfs revprop packing in f5 Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:38:11 -0400

On 07/07/2011 10:13 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> It means that all the '% ffd->max_files_per_dir' computations need to
> get an off-by-one iff they are for revprops. Special-casing r0 and the
> first shard's manifest seems to me, too, to be preferable.

Boo! Layer knowledge violation. Ignoring, oh, the tiny percentage of
Subversion code that does something special with r0 props, why would we
special-case this? 

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2011-07-07 16:38:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.