On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:01, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> We're almost ready to branch 1.7.x, and there remains the business of
> cleaning up the database schema from columns introduced in the 1.7
> development cycle. This has historically be labelled 'format 99', and
> is found at the bottom of wc-metadata.sql.
> It feels that the current schema is stable, so I'd like to propose
> that we make format 99 format 30, and release with the wc format as
> format 30. Users running development builds will have an automatic
> upgrade (as with recent wc format bumps).
Yes. Unless we NEED a format bump, then I don't see a reason to do
this. Just because we *can* doesn't mean we *should*.
The code is working just fine today. Let's just defer this work to the
next format bump, whenever that might be, in some future version of
Received on 2011-07-05 22:28:57 CEST