[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Third (and probably last) alpha coming later this week

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:57:11 -0400

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Anyway, from what I see this still has not been entered in the issue
>> tracker.  Also, if Bert seems to have a fix for the problem why are we
>> not just putting that in place?  I do not get the "waiting for Ivan"
>> part.  Is there anything blocking Ivan from making the fix a
>> better/different way if he finds the time?
>
> If I enable both Bert's code and Ivan's reverted change the regression
> tests PASS.

Yes, Bert said as much. The issue was that Ivan asked him not to
commit until he examined the problem in more detail.

BTW, Bert, Ivan indicated the Neon problem happens if you add the
directive "SVNAllowBulkUpdates off" to the server. This makes Neon
behave like Serf in terms of doing a GET for each file.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Received on 2011-07-05 15:57:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.