[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?

From: Konstantin Kolinko <knst.kolinko_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 20:56:24 +0400

2011/7/1 Peter Samuelson <peter_at_p12n.org>:
>> If this is too much trouble, b) why not write a list of edited
>> revprop files to a single file instead
> (...) Opening, reading, and parsing this file isn't going
> to be cheaper than a _single_ attempt to open a revprop file that does
> not exist. (...)
> Of course, the same can be said for the min-unpacked-revprop file
> today.

So, does n't it make min-unpacked-revprop file obsolete?

Is it true that instead of reading min-unpacked-revprop file one can:
 - try to open unpacked revprop file,
 - and if it does not exist go straight to reading the rev-props DB.

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

(Peter - sorry for resending, I forgot to CC to the list).
Received on 2011-07-01 18:56:59 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.