[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: recover_body() ### What if rNNN legitimately has no revprops? was: Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:07:45 +0100

Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> writes:

> Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 19:48:25 +0100:
>> for i in $(seq 0 $(svnlook youngest repo)) ; do
>> sqlite3 repo/db/revprops/revprops.db "insert into revprop values ($i, '()'"
>> done
>>From recover_body():
> /* No file? Hrm... maybe that's because this repository is
> packed and the youngest revision is in the revprops.db
> file? We can at least see if that's a possibility.
> ### TODO: Could we check for revprops in the revprops.db?
> ### What if rNNN legitimately has no revprops? */
> Your excerpt implies the answer to the first ###'d question is "Yes"
> (via looking for an empty skel), doesn't it?

I don't understand your question. The properties column is "NOT NULL"
so must have some value. Are you saying we don't need rows? I guess my
use of youngest is wrong, it should stop at the last packed rev. I
haven't actually run that script, I just wrote it in my email client :)

Received on 2011-06-30 21:08:21 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.