[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:20:42 +0300

Mark Phippard wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 14:08:52 -0400:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > You can't currently pack revision shards unless you also pack revprop
> > shards.  (but that's easy to change)
> FWIW, that was my assumption. I do not personally think that is a big
> deal. To me the key is that revprops are not stored in SQLite unless
> you explicitly pack the repository.

There is very little in common between rev packing and revprop packing.
I'm +0 on making it possible to enable one but not the other --- and
Kevin gave one use-case for that.

> --
> Thanks
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Received on 2011-06-30 20:21:40 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.