Re: svn_tests: E200006: failed merging diff 'foo6d' to 'bar6d' into 'foo6d'; Found: "XX\n", Expected: "Cc\n\n"
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 23:08:39 +0200:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > libsvn_diff/diff-diff3-test 2
> > fails for me:
> > [[[
> > subversion/tests/libsvn_diff/diff-diff3-test.c:653: (apr_err=200006)
> > subversion/tests/libsvn_diff/diff-diff3-test.c:316: (apr_err=200006)
> > subversion/tests/libsvn_diff/diff-diff3-test.c:220: (apr_err=200006)
> > svn_tests: E200006: failed merging diff 'foo6d' to 'bar6d' into 'foo6d';
> > FOUND:
> > Xx
> > EXPECTED:
> > Cc
> > FAIL: lt-diff-diff3-test 2: 2-way unified diff and trivial merge
> > ]]]
> > It fails with HEAD and with every revision I've tried, from r1128856 to
> > r1139812.
> > I build with -DSVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK=0 -DSUFFIX_LINES_TO_KEEP=0,
> > but these two alone don't are not sufficient to reproduce the issue.
> I don't understand. What do you mean with "these two alone are not
> sufficient to reproduce the issue."? Do you mean you tried it with
> those two options on system A, and it doesn't reproduce the issue, and
> with those two options on system B it does reproduce? If so, what's
> the difference between A and B?
I tried on two systems, on both of them these two flags are set, and
only on one of the two system the test fails.
> Or am I missing something?
Received on 2011-06-26 23:42:18 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev