[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:39:23 -0400

On 06/23/2011 10:35 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:17:19AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>>> Now, I'm fine with using something other than "absent" ("omitted",
>>>> "withheld", ...), but -1 on any terminology that allows the WC to presume to
>>>> know what it simply cannot.
>>> Julian also suggested "server-excluded". Would that work?
>> Sure! That would work quite well, actually.
> OK. As stated on IRC I am going to wait a while and then change it again
> from "unauthz" to "server-excluded" unless I hear objections.

Sounds good.

And to be clear, the reasoning behind your change is unassailable. I'm sure
several of us have been confused at one time or another regarding the
difference between "absent" and "not-present". :-)

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2011-06-23 16:39:56 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.