[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Fresh checkout vs 'svn upgrade': How good is good enough?

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_e-reka.si>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:11:20 +0200

On 18.06.2011 16:48, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 17:30, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>> This assumes creating many tempfiles is cheaper then updating/reading
>> the db. On Windows that is certainly not the case.
> Creating many tempfiles are expensive because APR/Subversion doesn't
> pass special flag (FILE_ATTRIBUTE_TEMPORARY) to CreateFile Windows API
> function call. Sqlite uses this flag and performance is much better.

I've seen this complaint on this list many times, but can't remember a
single patch proposal to dev_at_apr to fix it.

-- Brane
Received on 2011-06-18 22:12:00 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.