[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.7.0 blocking issues / branching

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:23:29 -0400

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 14:18, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:40 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> On 06/15/2011 12:36 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> I would also request that should the serf issues be resolved during
>>> our stabilization period, that we ship with the default as serf. ie.
>>> don't toss it because it may miss the branchpoint by a couple days
>>> (trying to avoid that, tho!)
>> Sure, no sweat.  It's not really until we're close to rolling RC1 that we
>> need to make the go/no-go call on Serf as the default.
> I don't envision at lot of time between the branch and the first
> release candidate for any serf stabilization to occur.  I suppose we
> could roll a beta shortly after the branch, and then start the RC
> train a couple weeks after that, though.

I was assuming that we would have a beta.

I dunno what kind of review the alpha is getting. Moving it to "beta"
would get more users. Of course, we still wouldn't know what kind of
review it is getting, but I would say "more" :-)

Received on 2011-06-15 20:24:01 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.