[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Fresh checkout vs 'svn upgrade': How good is good enough?

From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:33:59 +0200

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Also, has anyone tested this on an NFS-working copy? Or CIFS?
> AFAIK, no one is doing any performance testing on NFS or CIFS.  I have
> repeatedly invited users to run the benchmarks I wrote in this
> configuration but no one has bothered. This leads me to believe it is
> not important to people.

Maybe not important enough to the few people who build trunk (or
alpha-1) themselves (or rather: not important enough relative to the
required effort at this time). But that doesn't mean it isn't
important to a lot of users (okay, it will be a minority, but still).

> I tried to do it myself, but the NFS performance in my environment was
> so slow that I did not have the patience to wait for even the 1.6
> version of the tests to finish.

I'd like to test NFS performance in our corporate environment
(Solaris10/sparc server talking to NAS over NFS). But I don't have a
build environment for that system. If someone can build alphas or
trunk or whatever for Solaris/sparc, let me know. I'll try to give it
a run.

Received on 2011-06-15 00:34:52 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.