On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:17 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 04:11 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2011 11:52 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>>> Mike,
>>>> Thanks for picking up the pieces here. A couple of thoughts:
>>>> * Since the magic rev for the release is r1128011, the tag should be
>>>> based on that revision, per HACKING (see [1])
>>>> * From that point, we should then merge to the tag the relavant
>>>> revisions from 1.6.x to make the tag match the release.
>>>>
>>>> I feel that we should do the above, but would like to ensure I'm not
>>>> alone in that feeling.
>>>
>>> Okey dokey. Whatever you feel is best. (Can I assume you'll be taking
>>> these corrective measures yourself?)
>>
>> Happy to do so, to ensure my internal correctness meter doesn't go haywire. :)
>
> Heheh. I was merely thinking "He probably has a less manual process than
> the one I employed." :-)
Done, with the last commit in r1130806.
-Hyrum
Received on 2011-06-02 22:50:24 CEST