[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [serf-dev] Re: svn commit: r1124306 - /subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:57:10 +0400

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 09:28, Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>> It's really hard reproduce problem, because it's related to timing of
>> sending and receiving requests. From the code my feeling that issue is
>> still exists, just in more complicated scenario with more requests but
>> I didn't find reproduction script.
> Can you give me an idea why you think the issue still exists?  We'd be
> adding the new priority requests after all of the previously-queued
> (but unwritten) priority requests...so, unless I did a silly think-o,
> I don't see why it would if the situation matches what was described
> in the issue.  -- justin
May be it's different issue, but in case if server doesn't require
authentication for all requests and allow anonymous access for some
C: GET /restricted/
C: GET /public/
S: 401 /restricted/
S: 200 /public/ (client gets notification that second request is completed)
C: GET /restricted
S: 200 /restricted (clients gets notification that first request is completed)

Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2011-06-02 21:58:04 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.