[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bindings in default build?

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:31:56 +0100

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:

> On 05/24/2011 12:00 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:21, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:
>>>> I'll double-check before enabling the bindings build by default. (just
>>>> waiting for more feedback now)
>>> There was a rebuild issue last time I looked at the swig bindings.
>>> Every time I ran make check-swig-foo it rebuilt some (all?) of the foo
>>> bindings, i.e.
>>> make swig-foo
>>> make check-swig-foo
>>> make check-swig-foo
>>> built the bindings three times instead of once.
>> Ugh. Yeah... they can't become the default if they don't "stay built" :-P
> FWIW, I don't see this problem in my setup (Ubuntu 10.04, x86 platform,
> etc.) I build "in-tree", if you will.

Just checked my out-of-tree build and I no longer see the problem.

Received on 2011-05-24 18:32:29 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.