Re: bindings in default build?

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:21, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I'll double-check before enabling the bindings build by default. (just
>> waiting for more feedback now)
>
> There was a rebuild issue last time I looked at the swig bindings.
> Every time I ran make check-swig-foo it rebuilt some (all?) of the foo
> bindings, i.e.
>
>  make swig-foo
>  make check-swig-foo
>  make check-swig-foo
>
> built the bindings three times instead of once.

Ugh. Yeah... they can't become the default if they don't "stay built" :-P

It looks like the trend is towards making them the default, *if* we
can disable them at configure time and (per above) get the build
working as expected.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2011-05-24 18:00:46 CEST