Re: svn commit: r1126553 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/upgrade.c tests/cmdline/upgrade_tests.py tests/cmdline/upgrade_tests_data/format_28.tar.bz2

On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 13:16 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 23, 2011 12:48 PM, "Julian Foad" <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > Greg Stein wrote:
> > > On May 23, 2011 11:57 AM, <julianfoad_at_apache.org> wrote:
> > > >...
> > > was 40 hex digits. */
> > > > - if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG && strlen(path) == 40)
> > > > + if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG
> > > > + && (strlen(svn_dirent_basename(abspath, pool))
> > > > + ==
> > >
> > > On my phone, so I can't tell, but ... can basename() take NULL for the
> pool?
> >
> > Yes it can. You thinking we should pass NULL and so squeeze a few more
> > microseconds out of the developer-only upgrade scenario?
>
> The basename is completely transient, so there's no reason to alloc and
> copy.
>
> That said: you're right. It was a reflexive suggestion, which is kinda moot
> given the larger context.

No sweat. I got as far as being about to change it when I thought, Hold
on, this just isn't worth it this time.

- Julian
Received on 2011-05-24 11:12:12 CEST