[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] -r { DATE } with words

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 14:14:03 +0300

Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, May 21, 2011 at 13:07:19 +0200:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:20:41PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, May 20, 2011 at 17:26:39 +0200:
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> > > > BUT, why don't we just use standardized unit letters? e.g. {-1d}
> > > > means one day ago. Then we'd have something like
> > > >
> > > > [-+]<float-nr>[YyMDdHhmSs]
> > >
> > > What would we need the + for?
> >
> > (see below)
> >
> > > We cannot resolve future revisions.
> > >
> >
> > That's a false statement.
>
> Can you explain why?
> Do you mean if people set their clock to the past?

Either that, or set their svn:date properties to the future.

I'm basically saying that 'svn log -r {yyyy-mm-dd} file:///path/to/somewhere'
does not depend on what the machine thinks the current time is.
Received on 2011-05-21 13:14:46 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.