[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: WC format bump imminent - renaming pristines to <SHA1>.pristine

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:57:34 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:ivan_at_visualsvn.com]
> Sent: donderdag 19 mei 2011 11:39
> To: Julian Foad
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: WC format bump imminent - renaming pristines to
> <SHA1>.pristine
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:34, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:26 +0200, Julian Foad wrote:
> >> A WC format bump is imminent, in order to rename the pristine text files
> >> from '<SHA1>' to '<SHA1>.pristine', as discussed in the thread 'Add
> >> ".svn-base" suffix to the pristine files in 1.7' started by Konstantin
> >> Kolinko on 2011-05-18,
> >> <http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-05/0583.shtml>.
> >
> > Oh, it looks like the choice of name
> >
> > '<SHA1>.pristine'
> >
> > was not discussed in that thread. Two or three of us thought that
> > seemed like a sensible choice of name. The other reasonable option is
> > to keep the old extension so that the new names would be
> >
> > '<SHA1>.svn-base'
> >
> > The advantage would be that if anyone has already set up their tools to
> > filter out '*.svn-base' they wouldn't have to change that configuration.
> >
> > Any opinions?
> >
> [bikeshed] May be '<SHA1>.svn-pristine' ?

+1 on .svn-bikeshed

:-)

(I don't care, as long as it is somehow a unique enough suffix)

        Bert
Received on 2011-05-19 11:58:53 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.