Re: WC format bump imminent - renaming pristines to <SHA1>.pristine

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Oh, it looks like the choice of name
>
>  '<SHA1>.pristine'
>
> was not discussed in that thread.  Two or three of us thought that
> seemed like a sensible choice of name.  The other reasonable option is
> to keep the old extension so that the new names would be
>
>  '<SHA1>.svn-base'
>
> The advantage would be that if anyone has already set up their tools to
> filter out '*.svn-base' they wouldn't have to change that configuration.
>
> Any opinions?

+1 for .svn-base. No need to change just to change it. -- justin
Received on 2011-05-19 11:37:20 CEST