On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 23:15, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 07:52 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> One thing I am a little confused about, but maybe it is a question for
>> C-Mike. When Serf is used, the number of HTTP requests does not go
>> down very much. 81,938 -> 80,928 I imagine this is because Serf
>> already did not do all of the PROPFIND nonsense we do with Neon?
>> Still, what are the HTTPv2 benefits that Serf is supposed to see? I
>> seem to only see benefits when using Neon.
>
> I'd need to compare befores and afters to answer this with confidence, and
> I'm just not up for it tonight.
>
> Here's what I know:
>
> In 1.6, Serf had a property cache in place that was *supposed* to help
> reduce unnecessary requests. That cache is no longer present, because Ivan
> said it wasn't actually providing much benefit in real-world cases.
>
Correction: I've reimplemented that cache and made it even better than
it was in 1.6. See blncache.c for details.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2011-05-16 23:38:18 CEST