On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 13:45, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>> ivan_at_apache.org wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:24:46 -0000:
>>> Author: ivan
>>> Date: Sun May 15 14:24:45 2011
>>> New Revision: 1103391
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1103391&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> * notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>> (): Add notes to discuss.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>>
>>> Modified: subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda?rev=1103391&r1=1103390&r2=1103391&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda (original)
>>> +++ subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda Sun May 15 14:24:45 2011
>>> @@ -9,4 +9,8 @@ Potential items for discussion:
>>> * Let's finish Subversion 1.7
>>> * What's the plan for 1.8?
>>> * Key signing
>>> + * ra_serf issues
>>> + - Should we leave serf as default http library?
>>
>> Some issues here...
>>
>> serf is Apache licensed, neon is LGPL licensed, ASF projects must not
>> require non-AL-compatible defaults for non-optional features.
> Could you please provide a link for such requirements? Also we can
> consider http protocol isn't 'non-optional feature'
We can.
HTTP access has *always* been an optional bit of the Subversion
client, and using neon, either as the default or not, should not pose
a problem with ASF guidelines (so long as we don't distribute neon,
which we no longer do).
-Hyrum
Received on 2011-05-16 13:53:01 CEST