[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1102321 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 08:52:34 +0100

"Bert Huijben" <bert_at_qqmail.nl> writes:

>> case svn_wc_schedule_replace:
>> + if (parent_node->base && parent_node->work)
>> + return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_FEATURE, NULL,
>> + _("Cannot upgrade with copied/replaced directory '%s'"),
>> + svn_dirent_local_style(parent_node->base->local_relpath,
>> + scratch_pool));
>> +
> Isn't this a limitation from before we introduced multiple layers in NODES?
> In the BASE+WORKING world where we lived until half a year ago, you
> couldn't replace WORKING with something else. But now we can just
> introduce a new op_depth layer on top.

Yes, we can make it work but I'm not sure how much, if at all, the code
has to change. Until it works it is more user-friendly to return an
error rather than assert.

Received on 2011-05-13 09:53:13 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.