Re: svnrdump revision inconsistency bugs

Mark Eichin wrote on Thu, May 12, 2011 at 16:26:56 -0400:
> I haven't looked at the actual code (at this point I may be out of
> time and have to go with convincing people that git-svn's
> approximation is good enough)

Just a reminder, you always have the option to use svnsync + 'svnadmin dump'
instead of 'svnrdump dump'.

> but since I'd actually managed to narrow
> it down to a clean test case that didn't involve any of the
> dump-mangling I'm doing for the actual task, I figured it best to get
> that out there so people closer to the code can give it a try.

Thanks for the report; looking forward to see the concrete details (that
script which our mailing list software killed).
Received on 2011-05-12 22:40:42 CEST