[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.7 Performance via HTTP

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 07:45:09 -0700

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> <justin_at_erenkrantz.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I re-ran the results with your latest changes and posted the new numbers.
>> Is that with the commit as well as the patch I posted (but did not commit)?
> Just the commit.

There was a patch I posted to ra_serf:


That patch should halve the amount of data transferred between client
and server for the basic benchmark test.

However, I didn't commit it as I think it might be papering over a
larger issue with us not svndiff'ing when we could (should) be doing
so. Yet, as I said in my followup, ra_neon does the exact same thing
as this patch - so it's not far-fetched that we should apply this to
ra_serf as well.

> Wasn't the patch for mod_deflate?  And just to fix the memory leak
> when a client that does not support gzip connects?

I did that as well. =) -- justin
Received on 2011-05-12 16:45:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.