Re: 1.7 Performance via HTTP

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> <justin_at_erenkrantz.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I re-ran the results with your latest changes and posted the new numbers.
>>
>> Is that with the commit as well as the patch I posted (but did not commit)?
>
> Just the commit.

There was a patch I posted to ra_serf:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTinWWyXKw=W4jnbfuFpyYTAXugw-vw@mail.gmail.com%3E

That patch should halve the amount of data transferred between client
and server for the basic benchmark test.

However, I didn't commit it as I think it might be papering over a
larger issue with us not svndiff'ing when we could (should) be doing
so. Yet, as I said in my followup, ra_neon does the exact same thing
as this patch - so it's not far-fetched that we should apply this to
ra_serf as well.

> Wasn't the patch for mod_deflate?  And just to fix the memory leak
> when a client that does not support gzip connects?

I did that as well. =) -- justin
Received on 2011-05-12 16:45:38 CEST