On 05/10/2011 02:02 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
>
>> I'm thinking there's a pool lifetime issue or something. I just tried this
>> myself, and got:
>>
>> svn: E160006: No such revision 157327024
>>
>> Methinks that the svn_revnum_t this thing is trying to use at some point is
>> full of garbage.
>
> Valgrind complains:
>
> ==11432== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==11432== at 0x51294B0: svn_wc__db_op_copy_file (wc_db.c:4415)
> ==11432== by 0x51154C4: svn_wc_add_repos_file4 (update_editor.c:4943)
> ==11432== by 0x4E4CC5E: repos_to_wc_copy_single (copy.c:1600)
> ==11432== by 0x4E4D458: repos_to_wc_copy_locked (copy.c:1758)
> ==11432== by 0x4E4D51A: repos_to_wc_copy_cb (copy.c:1785)
> ==11432== by 0x50EDA54: svn_wc__call_with_write_lock (lock.c:1643)
> ==11432== by 0x4E4DD7A: repos_to_wc_copy (copy.c:1925)
> ==11432== by 0x4E4ECF6: try_copy (copy.c:2238)
> ==11432== by 0x4E4EF83: svn_client_copy6 (copy.c:2300)
> ==11432== by 0x40BE9A: svn_cl__copy (copy-cmd.c:125)
> ==11432== by 0x4168FD: main (main.c:2591)
> ==11432==
Yeah, I've found the problem. Just cleaning up the solution now.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-05-10 20:09:35 CEST