Ideally, we would get rid of the db_temp_ functions, and we would have
true WC API functions rather than the node_ functions. But... we've
basically said "for 1.7, we'll just go with what we have. no need to
'fix it' today."
The db_node_hidden would be nice to toss, but again: we can live with it.
db_wq_add is a little more problematic. It might indicate
transactional problems in the code. I've been thinking on those this
week (commit, notifications, etc).
The other items are fine. It is just backwards compat code at this
point, so there isn't anything more to do.
Thanks,
-g
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 09:23, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Does this tool still have any meaning for us? Do the results indicate
> any specific remaining work that must be done for 1.7?
>
> $ svn up
> Updated to revision 1099439.
>
> $ ./tools/dev/wc-ng/count-progress.py
> | libsvn_client | libsvn_wc | Total
> -----------------------+---------------+-----------+-------
> svn_wc_adm_access_t | 0 | 69 | 69
> svn_wc_entry_t | 0 | 5 | 5
> svn_wc__node_ | 103 | 43 | 146
> svn_wc__db_temp_ | 0 | 92 | 92
> svn_wc__db_node_hidden | 0 | 8 | 8
> svn_wc__loggy | 0 | 0 | 0
> svn_wc__db_wq_add | 0 | 8 | 8
> -----------------------+---------------+-----------+-------
> Total | 103 | 225 | 328
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
Received on 2011-05-05 20:47:02 CEST