On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 15:50, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:52, <hwright_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Mon May 2 14:52:26 2011
>>> New Revision: 1098605
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1098605&view=rev
>>> Followup to r1098594: apr_file_printf() doesn't return an error values, it
>>> returns the number of bytes printed, so just ignore its return value (and
>>> don't claim it's an error).
>>> * subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/translate-test.c
>>> (create_file): Ignore return for apr_file_printf().
>>> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/translate-test.c
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/translate-test.c?rev=1098605&r1=1098604&r2=1098605&view=diff
>>> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/translate-test.c (original)
>>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/translate-test.c Mon May 2 14:52:26 2011
>>> @@ -237,9 +237,7 @@ create_file(const char *fname, const cha
>>> const char *this_eol_str = eol_str ? eol_str : random_eol_marker();
>>> - apr_err = apr_file_printf(f, "%s", lines[i]);
>>> - if (apr_err)
>>> - return svn_error_create(apr_err, NULL, fname);
>>> + apr_file_printf(f, "%s", lines[i]);
>> If there is an ignored return value, then I like the form:
>> It makes it very clear that you *intended* to ignore the return value,
>> rather than accidentally ignoring it.
> In general I agree, but in all my years of C programming, I've very
> rarely seen that construct applied to printf() and its relatives.
> Since this is part of those family of functions, I think we can safely
> leave it as-is.
This isn't printf :-) ... but okee doke.
Received on 2011-05-02 21:54:24 CEST