Bert:
I think you should check with the community before doing a format
bump. You're cutting us out of the conversation.
-g
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 17:05, <rhuijben_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Apr 19 21:05:28 2011
> New Revision: 1095214
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1095214&view=rev
> Log:
> Bump our working copy format version to 28 and fixup the remaining MD5
> references in the NODES table to SHA1. (This also fixes the reference counts)
>
> On any working copy checked out in +- the last half year (and probably longer)
> this only bumps the working copy format number.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c
> (bump_to_28): New function.
> (svn_wc__upgrade_sdb): Add bump to 28.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql
> (STMT_UPGRADE_TO_28): Add the bump to format 28 query.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
> (SVN_WC__VERSION): Document format 28 and switch to 28.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c
> (svn_wc__db_pristine_read): Revert r1095194, which reverted some parts of
> r1091381.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c
> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql
> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c
>...
Received on 2011-04-19 23:38:12 CEST