On 07.04.2011 17:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> "Review of performance branch": I get the sense from the list traffic that
> we've kinda pulled what we want from this branch into trunk for now. Can
> someone confirm?
Someone can and I do ;) The remaining 20% of the patches
on the performance branch are not 1.7 material.
> "API performance analysis": We're doing some amount of this right now,
> though more at the operational level than at the API level. This is where I
> see value in hearing from our third-party API consumers/friends. We sorta
> put Stefan King on hold for a while while we were dinking around at higher
> levels in WC-NG. Would others agree that at this point, we're a bit more
> free to start soliciting (and responding to) performance evaluations from
> the likes of TortoiseSVN, AnkhSVN, subclipse, etc.?
As a TSVN developer and user: +1 on that.
-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2011-04-09 13:30:00 CEST