Re: Performance benchmarks-1.5 results show significant regression in 1.6

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:13 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:

> Well, I just made switch slower yesterday, and knowingly so.  At least, I
> made it do some extra up-front work to verify that the switch isn't
> potentially unwanted.  My changes won't affect the time spent doing the
> actual work of the switch (and you can pass --ignore-ancestry if you know
> what you're doing and skip my extra logic altogether).

These tests were via ra_local and pre-date your change. Plus the
problem I am saying we should look into would have been created in
1.6.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/